Iowa Opthalmologist Dr. John Stamler on Medical Marijuana: “I Think That You Can Trust Physicians to Prescribe Medicines in an Appropriate Way”

Dr. John Stamler, M.D., Ph.D., testified at the 2009 Iowa Board of Pharmacy hearing on medical cannabis in Iowa City, Iowa. Here’s a copy of his speech. Original transcripts of the 2009 hearings are available at Iowans for Medical Marijuana.

john Stamler, M.D., P.h.D. Voted one of America's Best Doctors 2005-2012 by Best Doctors, Inc. Selected as one of America's Top Ophthalmologists   by Consumer's Research Council of America.

john Stamler, M.D., P.h.D. Voted one of America’s Best Doctors 2005-2012 by Best Doctors, Inc.
Selected as one of America’s Top Ophthalmologists
by Consumer’s Research Council of America.

LLOYD JESSEN: Can you please state your name.

JOHN STAMLER: Yeah. My name is John Stamler. I am an ophthalmologist, M.D., and a Ph.D., and I do clinical research in ophthalmology. I know you’re going to hear a lot about other uses for medical marijuana, but I just wanted to put in a few words about the uses — potential uses of these substances for treatment of eye diseases, particularly glaucoma.

Glaucoma is — remains a leading cause of blindness in the United States. There are millions of people who are affected with this disease who still go blind even though we have numerous treatments, but none of them are perfect. There are still people who cannot tolerate side effects or are — or the drugs are not effective.

And we — glaucoma is a disease caused mostly by a high pressure in the eye. And we do know that THC and related compounds do lower pressure in the eye and both with topical and systemic use.
So these — these drugs have a lot of potential. However, they’re not being researched very much, and that’s primarily because — primarily because people don’t see that they’ll ever be available for use.

So without being licensable for use in patients, these potentially very useful drugs will never be investigated and never be studied, and we won’t find out if — if they’ll be useful or not.
I know as a researcher myself, I don’t want to spend a lot of time in my career researching something that will never have a potential of being used. So that’s my first point.
My second point is I think that you can trust physicians to prescribe medicines in an appropriate way. I think if — if there are safe and effective treatments found using medical marijuana that — that physicians can be entrusted to prescribe them reasonably and — and rationally just as we’re entrusted with opiates and benzodiazepines and amphetamines and other very — drugs that have a lot of abuse potential.

So I’d like you to consider this when you’re deliberating. Thanks.

LLOYD JESSEN: Thank you.

If you would like to have your testimony read by legislators next year, email me at jkarimi2007@hotmail.com. Don’t put anything incriminating in your letter. I’ll post it here on WeedPress, and you can remain anonymous if you’d like. Follow WeedPress on Facebook for more testimonials.



No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Subscribe to posts by email!

Join 105 other followers

%d bloggers like this: